An Abuja High Court on Thursday struck out the criminal charges filed by the Federal Government against Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the senator representing Kogi Central, bringing to a close a case that had attracted widespread public attention.
Court documents showed that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation submitted a Notice of Discontinuance, leading the court to formally terminate the criminal defamation and related charges that had been earlier instituted against the senator.
Natasha Livestreams Faceoff With Immigration Over Passport Seizure
The suit stemmed from comments allegedly made by Akpoti-Uduaghan during a televised interview and had sparked national debate over freedom of expression, political accountability, and the limits of prosecutorial authority in a democratic setting.
The Notice of Discontinuance, dated December 12, 2025, effectively ended proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025.
In his ruling, Justice C. N. Oji acknowledged receipt of the notice and consequently struck out the case. The judge noted that the development highlighted the importance of caution in the use of prosecutorial powers.
“The court hopes that this decision will pave the way for restraint, healing and respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” he stated.
Counsel to the Federal Government confirmed the withdrawal of the charges in open court, explaining that the decision was taken in accordance with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system.
Speaking after the session, Senator Natasha described the judgment as a vindication.
“Today’s outcome affirms my belief in the rule of law. I remain committed to serving my constituents and defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians,” she said, while also expressing gratitude to her legal team and supporters.
Sen Natasha Takes Edu to Fulani Settlement, Commissions New Model Schools
The discontinuance follows months of legal controversy, during which civil society organisations and rights groups criticised the prosecution as an attempt to muzzle free speech and limit political participation.